Now that the 1st September has been and gone I thought I’d see what happened, if anything, to the young man whom the Essex Police F
oarce had arrested and the CPS charged over encouraging people to join in a water fight.
In an attempt to refresh my memory on the details I looked at the original webpage, only to discover that some silent amendments have taken place and that the paragraph in question now has no reference to the water fight. Indeed it now reads (changes highlighted):
A 20-year-old man from Colchester who allegedly sent messages from a Blackberry encouraging violent disorder been charged with encouraging or assisting in the commission of an indictable only offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007. He has been conditionally bailed to appear at Colchester Magistrates’ Court on September 1.
Have they changed it because of the mockery? Let’s look at the report in the local paper and see what happened:
In a separate case Tommy Tucker, 20, was remanded in custody after being accused of encouraging the commission of an indictable offence.
The court heard he is accused of sending two messages on Blackberry messenger between August 7 and 10 which were intercepted by police.
Tucker did not enter a plea and will appear before Chelmsford Crown Court on November 7.
Essex Police had originally said his offences were linked to an attempt to start a water fight.
The force now says it was a different person who encouraged the water fight and that suspect has now been released without charge.
Well, well. It appears that someone either relayed the whole information to the
publicity public relations department or that said department got their knickers in a twist.
The one piece of good news to come out of this is that the individual who was trying to organise the water fight wasn’t charged. Perhaps some common sense does exist?