Who to believe?
A minor bout of swearing erupted on Sunday after seeing reports in the MSM that the Isambard Community School in Swindon had insisted that all parents must obtain a CRB check before watching sporting events at the school:
A spokesman said: “It is with regret that from now on we will be unable to accommodate parents wishing to spectate at our sports fixtures unless they are in possession of an up-to-date Swindon Council CRB check.
“At Isambard we take safeguarding very seriously and because of this we are unable to leave gates open for access to sporting venues at anytime during the school day.
“The current access arrangements are frustrating for both Isambard staff and parents and have recently resulted in reception staff and PE staff being on the receiving end of verbal abuse from parents who have become frustrated trying to get into or out of the school.”
Taken at face value this sounds like a very stupid idea. It is the preceding paragraph to this however which begins to shine some light on matters:
The school introduced the new measure at the start of the term to prevent strangers from accessing other parts of the school from the playing fields.
That the school is hardly keen on random people wandering the halls is fair enough. Can’t blame them for that but CRB checks are hardly the way to do it and parents don’t exactly count as strangers.
What I can’t work out though is whether the press release which the school issued on Monday morning is aimed at correcting what it sees as inaccurate media coverage or if it is a total climb-down on a massive over-reaction:
In light of the recent press coverage regarding CRB checks on parents wishing to watch their children play in sports fixtures we would like to issue the following statement:
“Parents are more than welcome to attend to watch sports fixtures at Isambard Community School. However, there is no access to the sports pitches through the main school building. Parents are requested to use the Tadpole Lane entrance where there is ample parking. There have previously been issues with parents and other visitors arriving at the Isambard Way entrance and being annoyed to be asked to drive to Tadpole Lane. However, we are unable to allow visitors access through the school during the normal school day, which includes the enrichment time between 3:15pm and 6pm. We hope this clarifies the school’s position.”
We apologise for the fact that the Advertiser were given out-dated information regarding this issue prior to the article going to press.
Given the state of the MSM in this country and the knee-jerk “Won’t somebody please think of the children” reaction of the unthinking section of the populace, it could be one, t’other or both!


XX which includes the enrichment time XX
WTFF is THAT for psychobabble imbicilic bullshit suposed to be???
I believe that the English translation is ‘after-school activities’ but I could be wrong as Google Translate doesn’t yet have a bullshit-to-English option.
Precisely what I was going to ask and you beat me to it.
A bit more politely than I was going to do tho…
A pint of whatever he/she drinks to the first teacher to tell a pupil, “Your Mum and Dad will not be watching you at the School Sports Day ‘cos we believe they may be a thieving paedophile.’ This will no doubt enhance the trust that the pupil has in the school’s obvious concern for their safety and also allow them to approach Social Services for a 2 bedroomed flat (one for the pupil and their sexual partner and one for the child they will no doubt have in the near future), a suitable living allowance and a taxpayer funded childminder while they retake their GCSEs. In the meantime, the parents of said pupil are rehoused by the Council as being ‘undesirable’ and given a caravan on one of the illegal traveller sites surrounding the town where they will feel, ‘more at home’. As a result of this, the headteacher will receive an award by Michael Gove for excellence in education. I’m lying really. Michael Gove wouldn’t go within 10 miles of a shithole like Swindown!
So is the school not requiring any CRB checks of any parent, or are they still requiring them but fudging the issue by saying that if parents use the alternative route then they won’t be forced to produce a CRB check.
Sorry, but I would withdraw a child of mine that had the misfortune to attend a school that had a policy such as this.